Legal Opinion
In re the Marriage of Ohr
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided July 1, 2004No. 03CA0726PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge DAILEY.
Juliane R. Ohr (wife) and Roger Bruch (intervenor) appeal from the judgment determining that Gerry Ohr (husband) is the legal father of the child born during husband’s marriage to wife. Husband cross-appeals from that part of the judgment allocating parenting time to intervenor. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for correction of the judgment.
Husband and wife had been married for twenty-two years when wife filed a petition for dissolution of marriage. The child had been conceived and born approximately three years before wife filed for dissolution of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Michael H. v. Gerald D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, In the Interest of M.M., a Child, and concerning C.M.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- N.A.H. v. S.L.S.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Martinez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In the Interest of E.L.M.C.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2004
- in Interest of M.BColorado Court of Appeals · 2020
- Patterson Recall Committee, Inc. v. PattersonColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
- In re the Parental Responsibilities of A.D.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- Glab v. JulianSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.