Higgins v. City of San Diego
California Supreme Court
APPEAL fro-m an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, denying a motion for a change of judges or a change of the place of trial of an action. J. W. Hughes and E. S. Torrance, Judges. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
—Plaintiffs bring the action for themselves and all other taxpayers of the city of San Diego. Certain de fendants answered the complaint and the defendant, the,water company, filed a cross-complaint. Upon the filing of the answer the plaintiffs dismissed their action, “leaving the contest to be waged between the water company on one side and tlie city and its officers on the other.” The issues are fully stated in the opinion of the chief justice on the first appeal (Higgins v. San Diego Water Co., 118 Cal. 524); from which it will lie seen that the cause was tried upon the issues…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Austin v. NalleTexas Supreme Court · 1893
- McBean v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Higgins v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- City of Dallas v. PeacockTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- Stockwell v. Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- City of Oakland v. Pacific Coast Lumber & Mill Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- People v. RodleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- People v. CarusoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- People v. FindleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Ex parte N. K. Fairbank Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1912
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.