Legal Opinion

City of Dallas v. Peacock

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1895No. 360PublishedCited by 55 opinions

Questions cebtified by Court of Civil Appeals for Fifth District, in an appeal from Dallas County.

1Opinion of the Court

GAIHES, Chief Justice.

Appeals, for the Fifth Supreme Judicial District, submit for our determination the following questions:

“In this case, and a number of others pending on the docket of this court, the question of disqualification of the judges occurs to us under the Halle case, cited below.

Two of the judges of the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fifth Supreme Judicial District own residences in the city of Dallas, and all three of them are taxpayers in the city of Dallas.

This was a suit below by appellee against the city of Dallas for $10,-000 for personal injuries alleged to have been…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of Austin v. NalleTexas Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Chambers v. HodgesTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Taylor v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Commonwealth v. RyanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
  5. Rose v. City of St. CharlesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Love v. WilcoxTexas Supreme Court · 1930
  2. McInnis v. Brown County Water Improvement Dist. No. 1Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Fry v. TuckerTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Postal Mutual Indemnity Co. v. EllisTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Nueces County Drainage & Conservation District No. 2 v. BevlyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API