Legal Opinion
Winston & Strawn LLP v. the Law Firm of John Arthur Eaves
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 11, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2013-1940PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Winston & Strawn LLP (“W & S”) brings this action against defendant Law Firm of John Arthur Eaves (“Eaves Law Firm”). 1 W & S claims that Eaves Law Firm breached a contract between the two parties by failing to pay for legal services provided by W & S. John Arthur Eaves, Jr. (“Eaves”) has filed a motion to dismiss for (1) failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and (2) ineffective service of process under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(5). 2 For the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bricklayers & Trowel Trades Int'l Pension Fund v. Kel-Tech Constr., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Parker v. John Moriarty & Assocs. of Va., LLCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Terry v. DewineDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Terry v. First Merit National BankDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- BELL v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRSDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2024
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.