Legal Opinion

United States v. Kny-Scheerer Corp. of America

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 9, 1927No. 2823PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

Merchandise, consisting of surgical forceps,' clamps, and needle holders, known in the trade as surgical instruments, and designed and used exclusively as such in the science of surgery, was assessed for duty by the collector at 60 per centum ad valorem as “hand *447forceps” under paragraph 354 of the Tariff Act of 1922, the pertinent part of which reads as follows:

Par. 354. Penknives, pocketknives, clasp knives, pruning knives, budding knives, erasers, manicure knives, and all knives by whatever name known, including such as are denominatively mentioned in this act, which have folding or other…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kotzin Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Empire Findings Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  2. Arthur Salm, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  3. O. E. M. Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  4. Boll v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  5. Gimbel Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API