Legal Opinion

Pacific Suppliers, Ltd. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 6, 1969No. C.D. 3819PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

This protest places in issue the classification of certain free standing cast iron ingot molds. The importations were classified under the provisions of item 674.10, Tariff Schedules of the United States (hereinafter referred to as TSUS), as ingot molds and assessed with duty at the rate of 9 per centum ad valorem. Plaintiffs claim that the articles in question are properly classifiable as non-malleable cast iron articles pursuant to item 657.09 of the TSUS and should be assessed with duty at the rate of 3 per centum ad valorem. The relevant statutory provisions read as follows:

674…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte CollettSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Takao Ozawa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Virginia v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Russell Motor Car Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Acheson, Secretary of State v. Fujiko Furusho. Ng Kwock Gee v. Acheson, Secretary of State. Wong Sho Ging v. McGranery Atty. Gen. Acheson, Secretary of State v. Lee Wing BewCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. W. R. Filbin & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. Kyocera International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1981
  3. Broderick & Bascom Rope Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  4. Nissho Pacific Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  5. Lohzin & Born, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API