State v. Snider
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIDEL, Chief Judge.
Appellant Guy Snider (defendant), found to have violated the terms of his probation, was reinstated on probation but required to serve a year in jail. On appeal defendant alleges that the trial court erred 1) by permitting the State to introduce unreliable hearsay at his violation hearing, and 2) by imposing a full year’s probationary jail term without crediting the time defendant had spent in custody awaiting violation hearing and disposition.
FACTS
Defendant was serving probationary terms for a pair of drug offenses when the underlying violation proceedings…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- State v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. RiveraArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. MathieuCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- State v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- State v. PortisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- In re Jonah T.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- State of Arizona v. Eddie Brian CarrCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007