Legal Opinion

State v. Portis

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 24, 1996No. 1 CA-CR 96-0225 to 1 CA-CR 96-0227PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FIDEL, Judge.

Appellant Donald Edward Portis, a probationer, was expelled from a rehabilitation program for providing a urine sample containing traces of cocaine. The trial court then revoked Appellant’s probation because Appellant had used cocaine and had failed to complete the rehabilitation program. Appellant, now in prison, appeals the revocation of his probation. Because the State failed to introduce reliable evidence to establish that a positive urine sample was taken from Appellant, we find that the State failed to meet its burden of proof.

I. HISTORY

Appellant was on probation for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. StottsArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State v. PetraliaArizona Supreme Court · 1974
  4. In Re Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-83341-SCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  5. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. JamesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
  2. State v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. State of Arizona v. Eddie Brian CarrCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. State v. ChavezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API