Legal Opinion

State v. Brown

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1975No. 3166-PRPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Chief Justice.

We granted this petition for review for the sole purpose of resolving an apparent conflict in the Rules of Criminal Procedure 1973, 17 A.R.S., and particularly the Comments thereto, with respect to the appellate remedy available to a defendant whose probation has been revoked pursuant to Rule 27 of said rules. The limited facts necessary for a determination of this matter are as follows. Defendant, after hearing pursuant to Rule 27, had his probation revoked and a sentence of not less than three nor more than five years in the Arizona State Prison imposed. From the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  2. State v. CorralesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. StottsArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. BarnettArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State v. GomezArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. WynnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  5. State v. RiveraArizona Supreme Court · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API