Legal Opinion
State v. West
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 31, 2012No. 081153828; A142519PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, P. J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII), ORS 813.010, raising several challenges to rulings related to the Intoxilyzer 8000 breath testing device and to the admission of breath test results. We conclude that there was no error and affirm.
We first summarize the pertinent statutes, administrative rules, and case law. Under ORS 813.300, the amount of alcohol in a person’s blood at the time the person is alleged to have been driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicants, as shown by chemical analysis of the person’s breath or…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. O'KeyOregon Supreme Court · 1995
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Munson v. Valley Energy Investment Fund, U. S., LPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. WixomCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. MaysCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Clark v. NoothCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State v. CovingtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.