Legal Opinion

Tisthammer v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1930No. 1580PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Riner, Justice.

This ease is before the court by direct appeal from a judgment of the District Court of Goshen County in favor of J. B. Tisthammer, respondent here, plaintiff below, who brought the action to recover damages on account of alleged injury and destruction of live stock, against the Union Pacific Railroad Company, which now seeks a review of the record made in the case.

Plaintiff’s petition alleges the corporate character of the defendant company; its duty to erect and maintain a sufficient and suitable fence on each side of its railroad track about two and one-half miles east of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Asbach v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  2. Lopez v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Cecil v. Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
  4. Blid v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Mooney v. MooneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Broom v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Northwest States Utilities Co. v. AshtonWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Dr. Pepper Company v. HeimanWyoming Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Alan & Alan, Inc. v. Gulfstream Car Wash, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  5. Gray Construction Co. v. FantleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API