Legal Opinion

Gray Construction Co. v. Fantle

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1934No. File No. 7189PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

•CAMPBELL, J.

The present litigation has been carried on in the courts of this state for about sixteen years. It has been twice ruled upon by the circuit court; three opinions have been written by this court, and two rehearings have been granted by this court, upon the second of which the case has been reargued and is now for our dfecision. Before writing further concerning it, we may profitably (in the words of Dhniel Webster) refer to the point whence we departed, in the hope of being able to conjecture where we now are.

In the year 1901 a small group of men in Sioux Falls, became interested…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. Gustin Minerva Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  2. Patterson v. LyndeSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Sullivan v. Mountain States Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Stoddard v. . LumNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Emory University v. BlissCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hirschfeld v. McKinleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  2. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. Emmet County Council of GovernmentsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  3. General Finance Corp. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.District Court, D. South Dakota · 1970
  4. Blain v. PattersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API