Legal Opinion
Doe 169 v. Brandon
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 9, 2014No. A12-1721PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*176OPINION
LILLEHAUG, Justice.
Respondent John Doe 169 brought a negligence claim against appellant Minnesota District Council of the Assemblies of God (District Council) because it recommended the renewal of the ministerial credentials of a church volunteer who sexually abused Doe. The District Council moved for summary judgment. The district court granted the motion on the ground that the District Council owed no duty of care to protect Doe. The court of appeals reversed and remanded. Citing Domagala v. Rolland, 805 N.W.2d 14 (Minn.2011), the court of appeals concluded that, even in the absence…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lubbers v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Domagala v. RollandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Germann v. F.L. Smithe MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Delgado v. LohmarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Flom v. FlomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Montemayor v. Sebright Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- Doe v. University of St. ThomasDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2017
- Fenrich v. Blake Sch.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- Senogles v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- Shank v. Carleton CollegeDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2017
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.