Legal Opinion
Fogle v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 11, 1999No. 2-98-325-CRPublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIXON W. HOLMAN, Justice.
Ronald Hugh Fogle was convicted of driving while intoxicated (“DWI”) with felony repetition. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. §§ 49.04, 49.08 (Vernon 1998). Appellant asserts three points on appeal, contending the evidence was legally insufficient to prove that he introduced alcohol into his body and factually insufficient to prove that he lost the normal use of his mental or physical faculties, and that the prosecutor improperly commented on his failure to testify. Because we find no reversible error, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
On April 5, 1997, Ray Lynn Leslie and Cedric…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Matson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- McDuff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
- McCown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Murphy v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
- Hernandez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2003
- Burkett v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2005
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.