Legal Opinion

Birdsall v. Helfet

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 11, 2025No. A170596Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 8/11/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO GARY BIRDSALL et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, A170596 v. BARTON HELFET, (San Francisco County Super. Ct. No. CGC-21-594428) Defendant and Appellant. Gary Birdsall was stopped on the Bay Bridge when his vehicle was rear-ended by Barton Helfet. Gary and his wife Pamela retained an attorney who initiated contact with Helfet’s insurer and who, prior to filing suit, sent the insurer a “policy limits settlement demand” of $100,000. The demand stated that the deadline…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Hughes v. PairCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Romano v. Rockwell International, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API