Legal Opinion

Ashley v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided February 8, 2012No. CA CR 11-613PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLIFF HOOFMAN, Judge.

| jAppellant Danny Lee Ashley appeals his convictions for possession of methamphetamine and possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to manufacture methamphetamine. On appeal, Ashley argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress verbal statements and physical evidence and erred in denying his motions for directed verdict. We find no error and affirm.

Ashley was charged with possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to manufacture methamphetamine and possession of a controlled substance (methamphetamine) with intent to deliver. Prior to trial,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Lilley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  3. Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  4. Meadows v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  5. Bohanan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Coger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
  2. Danny Lee Ashley v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2021
  3. Fowler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API