Legal Opinion

Economy Sales & Service Co. v. Family Center Pharmacy, Inc.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 29, 1994No. 12012PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO'Connell, J.

The defendant appeals from a judgment rendered against it after a trial to the court. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly held that (1) the bulk sales act was applicable and (2) a creditor has a cause of action against a transferror under the circumstances of the case. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Each of the issues raised by the defendant requires a factual determination by the trial court. We afford review only to claims based on the complete factual record developed by the trial court. We cannot guess or speculate on the existence of a factual predicate to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lauer v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. State v. RiosConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  3. Associated Catalog Merchandisers, Inc. v. ChagnonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. State v. HoeplingerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  5. Holmes v. HolmesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BeliveauConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  2. State v. RosedomConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  3. Rouillard v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  4. Cottiero v. IfkovicConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API