Craib v. Bulmash
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EAGLESON, J.
This case concerns the circumstances under which an employer may assert the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the United States Constitution as defenses to judicial enforcement of an administrative agency’s subpena duces tecum for records of a kind which all employers are required by law to maintain.
*478We first reject the employer’s claim that a court order compelling compliance with the agency’s subpena is an “unreasonable search and seizure” under the Fourth Amendment unless supported by “probable cause.” Forty years of United States Supreme Court decisions establish that the…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In Re AlvaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Millan v. Restaurant Enterprises Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Dep't of Indus. Relations v. UI Video Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- People v. KronckeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- State Ex Rel. Department of Pesticide Regulation v. Pet Food Express Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.