Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Buckley

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided May 19, 2016No. 516, 2015PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRINE, Chief Justice:

The Delaware Code requires that motor vehicle insurance include coverage for PIP benefits, which provide compensation to automobile occupants who are injured in an accident for various expenses, including medical bills and lost earnings. In this case, the plaintiff, Stephanie Buckley, seeks PIP benefits under 21 Del. C. § 2118, which provides that PIP benefits “shall be applicable to each person occupying such motor vehicle and to any other person injured in an accident involving such motor vehicle, other than an occupant of another vehicle.” 1 The defendant, State Farm,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Westerfield v. LaFleurSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  2. Kelty v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
  3. Kantola v. State Farm InsuranceAshtabula Municipal Court · 1979
  4. Sanchez v. American Independent Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  5. Gray v. Allstate Insurance Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Aikens v. Delaware Transit CorporationSuperior Court of Delaware · 2025
  2. Amoroso v. Enterprise Leasing Company of Philadelphia, LLCSuperior Court of Delaware · 2022
  3. Amoroso v. Enterprise Leasing Company of Philadelphia, LLCSuperior Court of Delaware · 2022
  4. Antoine Landing v. Builders FirstSource, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 2025
  5. BVFL I FI LLC v. Office Partners XIII Iron Hill LLCSuperior Court of Delaware · 2025

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API