Kelty v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
STEELE, Chief Justice:
This case addresses the scope of insurance coverage under Delaware’s personal injury protection (PIP) statute.1 A plaintiff who was injured in an accident sought PIP benefits from an insurance carrier. To determine whether the plaintiff was entitled to PIP benefits, a Superi- or Court judge applied Delaware’s current three-part test and analyzed: (1) “whether the vehicle was an ‘active accessory’ in causing the injury,” (2) “whether there was an act of independent significance that broke the causal link between use of the vehicle and the injuries inflicted,” and (3)…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Moore v. SizemoreSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
- Merrill v. Crothall-American, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1992
- Williams v. GeierSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
- Continental Western Insurance Co. v. KlugSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- LeVan v. Independence Mall, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. BuckleySupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
- Cooke v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
- Bon Ayre Land, LLC v. Bon Ayre Community AssociationSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
- CorVel Corp. v. Homeland Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
- First Health Settlement Class v. Chartis Speciality InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.