Foust v. Aetna Casualty & Insurance Co.
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge REED.
Aetna Insurance Company appeals the district court order adding interest and costs to the arbitration award in favor of William Foust. We reverse.
Foust claimed benefits under the uninsured motorist provisions of his insurance policy with Aetna. The claim, together with Foust’s contention that under the policy he was entitled to prejudgment interest upon the award and costs, was submitted to arbitration. An award was made in favor of Foust, but his request for interest and costs was denied.
The arbitrator determined that the right to interest and costs was a substantive…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Judd Construction Co. v. Evans Joint VentureSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. Makahuena Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1983
- Creative Builders, Inc. v. Avenue Developments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- In Re the Arbitration Between Lynch & Three Ponds Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1982
- International Service Insurance v. RossSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Dale v. Guaranty National Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Union Insurance Co. v. HottensteinColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
- Sooper Credit Union v. Sholar Group Architects, P.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- School City of East Chicago v. East Chicago Federation of Teachers, Local Number 511Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Applehans v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.