In Re the Arbitration Between Lynch & Three Ponds Co.
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
COYTE, Judge.
Three Ponds Co. appeals from a judgment of the trial court affirming an arbitration award. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
Three Ponds is a joint venture organized in 1971. The joint venture agreement entered into by the parties called for formal arbitration in the case of irreconcilable conflict among the members of the joint venture. The agreement provided that all ar-bitrations were to be conducted pursuant to the rules of the American Arbitration Association. American Arbitration Association Rule 42 provides that the arbitrator can make any award which is just “and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bushman Construction Company v. Air Force Academy Housing, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- Continental Materials Corp. v. Gaddis Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- Wright Lumber Co. v. HerronCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- Spiker v. HoogeboomColorado Court of Appeals · 1981
- Sisters of Mercy of Colo. v. MEAD & MOUNT CONST. CO.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1968
3Cited by12 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Cabs, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Foust v. Aetna Casualty & Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1989
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. SteinColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
- Leahy v. Guaranty National Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1995
- McNaughton & Rodgers v. BesserColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.