United States v. Banks
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Brandon Banks appeals his convictions for possession of stolen mail under 18 U.S.C. § 1708 and aggravated identify theft under 18 U.S.C. § 1028A, arguing that his conviction for aggravated identity theft should be vacated for lack of sufficient evidence. Banks is foreclosed from raising his sufficiency argument. Accordingly, we AFFIRM.
I
In September 2007, law enforcement officers conducted a warrant search of Brandon Banks’s home in Sugar Land, Texas, finding hundreds of “credit card mailing[s],” including credit cards and reports from credit card issuers. The officers also found cellular…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dino Cinel v. Harry F. Connick, Individually and as District Attorney for the Parish of Orleans, State of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Julius Carroll RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. John Norman Kleinschmidt and Michael Andrew SorrentinoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Charles A. Jackson v. State of Louisiana, Charles C. Foti, Jr., Individually and in His Official Capacity as Criminal Sheriff of the Parish of OrleansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Jose Nabor CantuCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. DelgadoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. BroussardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Jose Elizondo v. City of Garland Police DepCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Marco Alvarado-ZarzaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Nobryan McGeeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.