Legal Opinion

United States v. Jose Nabor Cantu

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 7, 1975No. 74--3537PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant Jose Nabor Cantu seeks reversal of his conviction of importation and possession with intent to distribute 192 pounds of marijuana. He alleges that the search was illegal and that the marijuana should have been suppressed. He also argues that the marijuana should have been introduced into evidence at trial. We have reviewed the record and find these contentions to be without merit and affirm.

Appellant and a female passenger were stopped at the Sarita checkpoint at about 11:40 p. m. on January 31, 1974. They stopped at the stop sign and waited for the border patrolman to come out of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Almeida-Sanchez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. Lawrence Edward HartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  3. United States v. Juan Cantu, Michael Neil Emigh, and David Edward MichaudCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  4. United States v. Annette Graham and John Lonnie JerkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  5. United States v. Richard Keathley WooldridgeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. CadenaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. United States v. John Norman Kleinschmidt and Michael Andrew SorrentinoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  3. Allen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
  4. United States v. BanksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. CadenaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API