Legal Opinion

United States v. Julius Carroll Robertson

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 7, 1983No. 81-2117PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WISDOM, Circuit Judge:

The questions this appeal raises are whether a stipulation admitting the essential facts of a criminal offense should be treated as equivalent to a guilty plea and whether the stipulation coupled with a reservation of nonjurisdictional defenses in a motion to dismiss should be treated as equivalent to a conditional plea of guilty, not tolerated in this circuit.1 We hold that in the absence of prosecutorial coercion or cajolery the stipulation was equivalent to in-court testimony in a trial, that the defendant, represented by counsel, never intended the stipulation to…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WilliamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  2. Ex Parte MartinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. David L. Adams v. R.S. Peterson, Superintendent of O.S.C.I.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. Randall Dwayne MuseCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. James J. LyonsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API