United States v. Julius Carroll Robertson
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WISDOM, Circuit Judge:
The questions this appeal raises are whether a stipulation admitting the essential facts of a criminal offense should be treated as equivalent to a guilty plea and whether the stipulation coupled with a reservation of nonjurisdictional defenses in a motion to dismiss should be treated as equivalent to a conditional plea of guilty, not tolerated in this circuit.1 We hold that in the absence of prosecutorial coercion or cajolery the stipulation was equivalent to in-court testimony in a trial, that the defendant, represented by counsel, never intended the stipulation to…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Ex Parte WilliamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Ex Parte MartinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- David L. Adams v. R.S. Peterson, Superintendent of O.S.C.I.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Randall Dwayne MuseCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. James J. LyonsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.