Legal Opinion
Hetchkop v. Gundolt Carpet Workroom, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 6, 1994No. 92 Civ. 4830 (JES)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Bert Hetchkop, in his fiduciary capacity as director, and the New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund, Pension Fund, Vacation Fund, Annuity Fund, Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund and Supplemental Fund (the “Benefit Funds”) bring this action to recover on a surety bond issued by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (“Liberty”). Each party seeks summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and in addition, Liberty seeks a dismissal of the complaint…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Seiden Associates, Inc. v. Anc Holdings, Inc., American National Can Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- American Home Products Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Barker v. Madison AssociatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- International Union of Operating Engineers Local 57 v. Seaboard Surety Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1996