Legal Opinion
Barker v. Madison Associates
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 17, 1994No. 92 Civ. 3897 (LMM)Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
McKENNA, District Judge.
Plaintiff Fred Barker (“Barker”) commenced this action against Defendants on May 29, 1992. The Court is now presented with Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment with regard to liability, and Defendants’ cross-motion for summary judgment dismissing the Complaint. Plaintiff also seeks to sever the third-party action against National Cleaning Corp. (“National”). For the reasons stated below, Plaintiffs motions are denied, and Defendants’ motion is granted.
I
Pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, summary judgment should be granted…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.