Legal Opinion · Dissent

Steadman v. Securities & Exchange Commission

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 20, 1981No. 79-1266Published

1DissentJustice Powell

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), acting under the antifraud provisions of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, has imposed severe sanctions on petitioner. He has been barred permanently from practicing his profession and also forced to divest himself of an investment at a substantial loss. In making its findings of fraud and imposing these penalties, the SEC applied the “preponderance of the evidence” standard of proof.

The Court today sustains the action of the SEC, holding *105that § 7 (c) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U. S. C. §…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Collins Securities Corporation and Timothy Collins v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  4. Weininger v. Metropolitan Fire InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Bowe v. GageWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API