Legal Opinion

State v. Rochefort

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 5, 2000No. C2-00-148PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLAPHAKE, Judge.

Appellant Rick Allen Rochefort challenges his conviction of first-degree manufacturing, possession, and sale of meth-amphetamines, arguing that the warrant authorizing the police search that led to the discovery of methamphetamines in his home was not supported by sufficient probable cause. We agree and reverse.

FACTS

On March 1, 1999, Robert Toland, a Faribault County Sheriffs Deputy assigned to the South Central Drug Investigative Unit, submitted an affidavit in support of his application for a warrant to search appellant’s residence in Winnebago. The affidavit…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. State v. MunsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  3. State v. ZanterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  4. State v. BradfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  5. State v. ElingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. RochefortSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API