State v. Rochefort
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLAPHAKE, Judge.
Appellant Rick Allen Rochefort challenges his conviction of first-degree manufacturing, possession, and sale of meth-amphetamines, arguing that the warrant authorizing the police search that led to the discovery of methamphetamines in his home was not supported by sufficient probable cause. We agree and reverse.
FACTS
On March 1, 1999, Robert Toland, a Faribault County Sheriffs Deputy assigned to the South Central Drug Investigative Unit, submitted an affidavit in support of his application for a warrant to search appellant’s residence in Winnebago. The affidavit…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. MunsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. ZanterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. BradfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. ElingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. RochefortSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001