State v. Rochefort
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANCASTER, Justice.
We granted review in this case to address a narrow question: What is the correct standard of review for an appellate court examining a district court’s probable cause determination made upon issuing a search warrant? The court of appeals reviewed the determination de novo. Because we conclude that the court of appeals erred in conducting a de novo review, we reverse and remand to that court for application of the correct, deferential standard of review.
On March 1, 1999, police executed a search warrant at respondent Rick Allen Rochefort’s residence and seized…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Massachusetts v. UptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. ZanterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. WileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. GailSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.