Legal Opinion

State v. Rochefort

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 19, 2001No. C2-00-148PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANCASTER, Justice.

We granted review in this case to address a narrow question: What is the correct standard of review for an appellate court examining a district court’s probable cause determination made upon issuing a search warrant? The court of appeals reviewed the determination de novo. Because we conclude that the court of appeals erred in conducting a de novo review, we reverse and remand to that court for application of the correct, deferential standard of review.

On March 1, 1999, police executed a search warrant at respondent Rick Allen Rochefort’s residence and seized…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Massachusetts v. UptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. State v. ZanterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  5. State v. WileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. State v. CarterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  3. State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  4. State v. GailSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  5. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API