Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Chesapeake Construction Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 14, 1930No. [No. 8, January Term, 1930.]PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBond, C. J.

The question here is whether the validity of a release under seal, pleaded in a suit at law on the liability alleged to have been released, can be attacked on the ground of deceit, misrepresentation, and fraud. The defendant pleading the release refers to the rule that a court of law could consider only an attack on the factum or the execution of a sealed instrument on the ground of fraud, while an attack on antecedent fraud, in the inducement, or in' deceit and misrepresentations, could be made only in equity. And the trial court held that the replication in which the question of validity…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. George v. TateSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Hartshorn v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1857
  3. Spitze v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
  4. Olston v. Oregon Water Power & Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Colonial Development Corp. v. BragdonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Creamer v. HelferstayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  2. Furst v. CarricoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
  3. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932
  4. Allender v. GhingherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  5. Creamer v. HelferstayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API