Legal Opinion

Spitze v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 14, 1892PublishedCited by 56 opinions

Appeal from the Baltimore City Court. The caséis stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcSherry, J.

This suit was brought to recover damages for a personal injury received hy the appellant whilst in the service of the appellee. The appellant was a blacksmith, and in the discharge of his duties had occasion to use a steam trip-hammer owned by the railroad company. One of the housings of this hammer was insecurely *165fastened, and, as a consequence, when the hammer was being operated by a co-employé of the plaintiff, it suddenly fell upon and seriously crushed the right hand of the appellant. To the declaration the company pleaded —first, not guilty; and, secondly, two releases executed by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mershon v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
  2. McConkey v. CockeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Canaras v. Lift Truck Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. BeazleySupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  3. Ray v. EuriceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
  4. Parish v. Maryland & Virginia Milk Producers Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  5. Vincent v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API