Legal Opinion

State v. . McAllister

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 12, 1924PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

Chapter 1, section 2, Laws 1923 (known as the “Tur-lington Act”), is as follows: “No person shall manufacture, sell, barter, transport, import, export, deliver, furnish, purchase, or possess any intoxicating liquor, except as authorized in this act; and all the provisions of this act shall be liberally construed, to the end that the use of intoxicating liquor as a beverage may be prevented. Liquor for non-beverage purposes and wine for sacramental purposes may be manufactured, purchased, sold, bartered, transported, imported, exported, delivered, furnished, and possessed, but only as provided…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cunard Steamship Co. v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. State v. . TooleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. United States v. SimpsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. GoodhopeDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1920
  5. State v. . StrangeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. . MaslinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  2. State v. . JarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. State v. BarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. State v. ShinnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. State v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API