State v. . Wilson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.
Guilford County bas not elected to come under tbe Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. Chap. 49, P. L. 1937, G. S., Chap 18, Art. 3. Hence tbe Turlington Act, Chap. 1, P. L. 1923, G. S., Chap. 18, Art. 1, as modified by tbe general provisions of tbe Alcoholic Beverage Control Act, is in full force and effect within that territory. G. S., 18-61; S. v. Davis, 214 N. C., 787, 1 S. E. (2d), 104.
A person living in territory in wbicb ABC Stores are not operated may lawfully transport to and keep in bis private dwelling, for bis own use, not more than one gallon of tax-paid liquor, and such possession…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- State v. . EppsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- State v. . CrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
- State v. . SuddrethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- State v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. FennerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- D & W, INC. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. WelchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- State v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- State v. BarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.