Legal Opinion

State v. . Jarrett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 22, 1925PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

It may not be amiss to give the entire section 2, of the Turlington or Conformity Act, Public Laws 1923, ch. 1:

“No person shall manufacture, sell, barter, transport, import, export, deliver, furnish, purchase, or possess any intoxicating liquor except as authorized in this act; and all the provisions o£ this act stall be liberally construed to the end that the use of intoxicating liquor as a beverage may be prevented. Liquor for nonbeverage purposes and wine for sacramental purposes may be manufactured, purchased, sold, bartered, transported, imported, exported, delivered, furnished, and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. State v. . TooleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. State v. . DowdySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. State v. . HaneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1837
  4. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  5. State v. Burnett.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. State v. BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. State v. . AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  5. State v. . CombsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API