Legal Opinion

United States v. Simpson

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 19, 1920No. 444PublishedCited by 49 opinions

ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. The case is stated in the opinion. This case is ruled by United States v. Hill, 248 U. S. 420. The judgment in the present case rests solely upon the idea that, in order to be transportation in interstate commerce, transportation must be by common carrier.

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. The case is stated in the opinion. This case is ruled by United States v. Hill, 248 U. S. 420. The judgment in the present case rests solely upon the idea that, in order to be transportation in interstate commerce, transportation must be by common carrier. But transportation, in order to constitute interstate commerce, need not be by common carrier, and may be. transportation by the owner of the goods. Railroad Company v. Husen, 95 U. S. 465, 469-70; Kirmeyer v. Kansas, 236 U. S. 568, 572; Kelley v. Rhoads, 188 U.…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Van Devanteb

This is an indictment under § 5 of the Act of March 3, 1917, known as the Reed Amendment, c. 162, 39 Stat. 1069, which declares that “ whoever shall . . . cause intoxicating liquors to be transported in interstate commerce, except for scientific, sacramental, medicinal, and mechanical purposes, into any State . . . the laws of which . . . prohibit the manufacture or sale therein of intoxicating liquors for beverage purposes shall be punished,” etc.; and the question for decision is whether the statute was applicable where the liquor — five quarts of whiskey — was transported by its owner in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. The Pipe Line CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. United States v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Kelley v. RhoadsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Danciger v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Kirmeyer v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United States Department of Treasury v. FabeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Associated Press v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Cunard Steamship Co. v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. United States v. Frank P. Bongiorno, United States of America v. Frank P. BongiornoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API