Wichita Sanitarium v. Bierschbach
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hutchison, J.:
The main question involved in this appeal is whether the statements contained in two certain letters written by *85the maker of the note upon which the action is brought constitute a sufficient acknowledgment of an existing liability under R. S. 60-312 to toll the five-year statute of limitations. The note itself is conceded to be barred by the statute, but the two letters are alleged to have been written by the defendant acknowledging the indebtedness within five years prior to the bringing of the action. The trial court overruled the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hanson v. TowleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Elder v. DyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- Hawkins v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
- Durban v. KnowlesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
- Corbett v. HossSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Golden Rule Oil Co. v. LiebstSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
- Gorrill v. GoffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Hottell v. KempSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
- Salt Lake Transfer Co. v. ShurtliffUtah Supreme Court · 1934
- Dechand Roofing & Supply Co. v. SchumakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.