Legal Opinion

Golden Rule Oil Co. v. Liebst

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 25, 1941No. 35,010PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, C. J.:

This was an action to recover on a promissory note dated February 5, 1929, payable on demand. Credits for payments made on April 17, and on September 11, 1929, were endorsed on the note.

The action was begun on January 23, 1940, and to save it from the bar of the statute of limitations plaintiff alleged that on May 15, 1935, and also on June 4, 1935, defendant wrote and signed certain letters to the president of the plaintiff company in which he acknowledged the indebtedness evidenced by the note as an existing obligation.

The letters were…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  2. Hottell v. KempSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  3. Harbaugh v. HerrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  4. Wichita Sanitarium v. BierschbachSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  5. Updegrove v. CooperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Payless Shoesource, Inc. v. Travelers Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  2. Schnug v. SchnugSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  3. Stanbury v. LarsenWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Dechand Roofing & Supply Co. v. SchumakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  5. Stone v. SmootSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API