Legal Opinion

Elder v. Dyer

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1881PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Error from, Franklin District Court. Action brought by Dyer against Alvah Elder and P. P. Elder, on a promissory note. Trial, and judgment for plaintiff, at the May Term, 1881, of the district court. The defendant P. P. Elder brings the case here. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

"Valentine, J.:

This was an action brought by Matilda Dyer against Alvah Elder and P. P. Elder, on a promissory note, which reads as follows:

*605“Ottawa, Kansas, Sept. 5th, 1871.
“For value received, I promise to pay to Matilda Dyer, or order, of New Portland, Maine, five hundred dollars, with interest at ten per cent, per annum until paid, payable on or before one year from date. Alvah Elder,

[Revenue stamp — 10c., canceled.] P. P. Elder.” ■

The plaintiff alleged in her petition, among other things, as follows:

“The following indorsements appear on said note:…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hanson v. TowleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  2. Steele v. SouderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  3. Pears v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. John W. Masury & Son v. Bisbee Lumber Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Hawkins v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  3. Williams v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  4. Weir v. BauerUtah Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Dern v. OlsenIdaho Supreme Court · 1910

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API