Burnham v. Burnham
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtWheelek, C. J.
The third clause devises all of the testator’s real estate to his two sons, George F. and Raymond H. Burnham. The seventh clause provides that in case of the death of either or both of said two sons, without leaving any issue, the real estate so de vised to his two sons shall be equally divided between his two daughters, Florence and Eva, in fee simple absolute forever. The absolute devise of the third clause might be cut down to a lesser devise by a subsequent provision clearly showing that it was the testator’s intention to give such lesser estate. There are no extraneous circumstances nor…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hull v. HullSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Lawlor v. HolohanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
- Walsh v. McCutcheonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
- Strong v. ElliottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
3Cited by9 opinions
- Belcher v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Reaney v. WallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- Scanlin v. PetersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Union & New Haven Trust Co. v. SellekSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Allen v. TysonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.