Hull v. Hull
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.
The first clause of the will of Sarah Hull devises and bequeaths all of her property to her daughters Marietta and Caroline. The second clause provides that “at the decease of my two daughters if childless it is my will that the same be equally divided between ... or their heirs and assigns forever.” The question for our advice is whether the second clause cuts down the devise and bequest of the first clause to a life use and gives the fee to the persons therein named. From two grounds, quite independent of each other, the only construction permissible under our law is that the second clause…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mansfield v. SheltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
- Fanning v. MainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
- Meriden Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. SquireSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
- Burr v. TierneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Lawlor v. HolohanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Peyton v. WehrhaneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Trowbridge v. TrowbridgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Merchants Bank & Trust Co. v. New Canaan Historical SocietySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Zauner v. BrewerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Scanlin v. PetersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.