Legal Opinion
Reaney v. Wall
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 17, 1948PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The plaintiff, in this action against his two sisters, the defendants, asked the court to determine the rights of the parties to certain real estate in Torrington under the terms of their father’s will and to quiet and settle the title thereto. By the will, which was duly probated November 7, 1935, the testator provided: “1. I give and devise to my son, William D. Reaney, property on East Pearl Street, with dwellings and buildings thereon, known as 99 and 101 East Pearl Street, in said City of Torrington, with the provision that said property be not sold, transferred, or externally altered or…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mansfield v. SheltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
- Union & New Haven Trust Co. v. AckermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Cumming v. PendletonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- In Re the Accounting of CramerNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Swole v. BurnhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Loewenberg v. WallaceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Land O' Lakes Dairy Co. v. County of WadenaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Chase National Bank v. GuthrieSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. v. HuntingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Monick v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.