Legal Opinion

Scanlin v. Peterson

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 16, 1926PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

The intent and effect of the second paragraph of the will are unmistakable. The right therein given to William Scanlin and his family to make their home on the premises in which the testator’s wife, Martha, was given a life estate contemplated, as to his “family,” a joint occupancy, with him, and a continuance of his life use during such occupancy of the premises. The succeeding sentence has no reference to that occupancy, but deals solely with the conditions under which a bequest to the testator’s wife of $800, in addition to her life estate, might become effective, i.e., only if William die…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mansfield v. SheltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
  2. Allen v. AlmySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
  3. Hull v. HullSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  4. Fanning v. MainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
  5. Meriden Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. SquireSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1918

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Peyton v. WehrhaneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  2. Palmer v. FrenchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  3. Belcher v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  4. Reaney v. WallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  5. Brown v. PotterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API