Legal Opinion

State v. Kirk

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 2, 1992No. 13129-3-IIPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPetrich, C.J.

We accepted discretionary review of the trial court's order directing the retrial of a charge of first degree statutory rape against William Kirk. He contends that the double jeopardy clauses of the state and federal constitutions bar a retrial.

The issue presented is whether the trial court's act of discharging the jury without Kirk's consent, after the jury had entered a guilty verdict on a lesser included offense, prosecution of which was barred by the statute of limitation,1 without having made a determination of guilt or innocence of the greater offense, terminated jeopardy on the *790greater…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. GockenWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. LintonWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  4. State v. FishCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  5. State v. CrislerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API