State v. Kirk
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtPetrich, C.J.
We accepted discretionary review of the trial court's order directing the retrial of a charge of first degree statutory rape against William Kirk. He contends that the double jeopardy clauses of the state and federal constitutions bar a retrial.
The issue presented is whether the trial court's act of discharging the jury without Kirk's consent, after the jury had entered a guilty verdict on a lesser included offense, prosecution of which was barred by the statute of limitation,1 without having made a determination of guilt or innocence of the greater offense, terminated jeopardy on the *790greater…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. GockenWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. LintonWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- State v. FishCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- State v. CrislerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.