Legal Opinion

State v. Barnes

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 7, 1997No. 17717-0-IIPublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeinfeld, C.J.

Bernard Barnes appeals his conviction of leading organized crime, contending that the trial court should have applied principles of double jeopardy and collateral estoppel to bar the prosecution. Clallam County had earlier brought a civil forfeiture action against Barnes based upon the same criminal conduct. That action was dismissed with prejudice on Barnes’s motion for summary judgment. Barnes’s 13 assignments of error also include complaints of prosecutorial vindictiveness, erroneous evidentiary rulings, an inconsistent jury verdict, juror misconduct, and insufficient evidence. He also…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited78 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. State v. McNealWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. DeYoung v. Cenex Ltd.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. State v. DepazWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. DepazWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API