Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Tedesco
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 27, 2010PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1413Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 15, 2008, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.
Claimant was employed for seven months as an interstate, long-haul, tractor-trailer driver. While on medical leave, claimant wrote a letter to the employer stating that he was on “strike” because he was dissatisfied with certain working conditions and gave the employer three options, one of which was to ask claimant to resign. In response, the employer…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re the Claim of GrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of VelezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re the Claim of DoyleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re the Claim of BielakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re the Claim of BielakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.