Legal Opinion

Mooney v. McCarthy

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 1, 1935PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSlack, J.

This is an action in tort to recover for personal injuries plaintiff received in an automobile accident. McCarthy was charged with ordinary negligence, Gould with gross negligence; there was a verdict and judgment against both, and the ease is here on McCarthy’s exceptions.

The accident happened on Main Street in the village of Wallingford about 7.45 p.m. April 21, 1934. The street runs north and south. McCarthy, hereafter called the defendant, lives east of it. There is a driveway from the street to his place which passes over a cement culvert about 11 feet 9 inches long and 2y2 feet above…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hatch v. DanielsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1922
  2. Wellman, Admr. v. WalesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  3. City of Birmingham v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. Steele v. FullerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  5. Howley v. KantorSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. ArenaHawaii Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Weddle v. LogesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Farrell v. GreeneSupreme Court of Vermont · 1938
  4. Gilday v. HauchwitNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  5. Martinez v. HernandezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API