Legal Opinion

Steele v. Fuller

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 4, 1932PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The plaintiff seeks to recover damages for personal injuries and damage to his automobile received in an automobile collision. There was a trial by jury, and a verdict and judgment thereon for the plaintiff. The defendant excepted. At the close of the evidence, the defendant moved for a directed verdict. The motion was denied. The only ground of the motion that we consider is that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as matter of law.

The collision occurred on July 13, 1929, about nine o’clock p.m. At that time it was rather dark and cloudy. The defendant, driving a Cadillac…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Hatzakorzian v. Rucker-Fuller Desk Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Ruth v. VroomMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Hatch v. DanielsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1922
  4. Fisher v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  5. Jaquith v. WordenWashington Supreme Court · 1913

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Tyson v. . FordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Price v. State Highway CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Smiley v. Arrow Spring Bed Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Murray Ex Rel. Murray v. Pearson Appliance StoreNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Lindquist v. ThiermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API