Legal Opinion

Township of Elba v. County of Gratiot

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1939No. Calendar 39,874PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Petitioners in the circuit court of Gratiot county by suit started in January, 1936, sought a peremptory writ of mandamus requiring the respondents and appellees to allocate, apportion and pay, from moneys received by the county of Gratiot pursuant to the provisions of Acts Nos. 7 and 8, Pub. Acts 1934 (1st Ex. Sess.), and Acts Nos. 81 and 107, Pub. Acts 1933, $10,680 for the retirement of good roads bonds of Elba township.

The trial court denied the relief sought, holding Acts Nos. 7 and 8, Pub. Acts 1934 (1st Ex. Sess.), were unconstitutional because the governor had not, in his call for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Amos v. MathewsSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Schnader v. LiverightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Mitchell v. LowdenIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Attorney General v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Berry v. FoxWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re Certified QuestionMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  2. People v. StoudemireMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Metropolitan Council No 23 v. Oakland County ProsecutorMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance v. Michigan Catastrophic Claims Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Smith v. FotoMichigan Supreme Court · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API