Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Smith v. Foto

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1938No. Docket No. 95, Calendar No. 39,954PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

April 14, 1937, plaintiff filed a bill of complaint against defendant Anna Mary Foto alleging he is a resident of the city of Miami Beach, Dade county, Florida, and defendant is a citizen of Detroit. The National Bank of Detroit, the Safe Deposit Com pany of Detroit, the Wolverine Storage Company, the Schettler Drag Company, and the Mon Mar Oil Corporation were made defendants because of their financial interests in the litigation, but the bill of complaint is really aimed at Anna Mary Foto (also known as Anna I. Smith).

Plaintiff alleges he met Anna Mary in the spring of 1931; she informed…

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Haddock v. HaddockSupreme Court of the United States · 1906

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Old Colony Trust Co. v. PorterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  2. Carpenter v. CarpenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Zirkalos v. ZirkalosMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Chirelstein v. ChirelsteinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  5. Howe v. HoweSupreme Court of Virginia · 1942

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API